Hi Larry,

> Would the system benefit from either having multiple server
> processes accepting RRD update commands or a multi-threaded
> server process, or are all the updates disk bound (aka the disk
> is too busy)?  I have found that the RRD update process not to be
> too disk intensive, at least from the aggregate I/O perspective.
> However, disk seeks may be keeping the heads pretty busy.  This I
> have not evaluated.

its disk, run top while the updates run .. the cpu i normaly almost
idle ...

cheers
tobi

-- 
Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten
http://tobi.oetiker.ch [EMAIL PROTECTED] ++41 62 213 9907

--
Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help        mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archive     http://lists.ee.ethz.ch/rrd-developers
WebAdmin    http://lists.ee.ethz.ch/lsg2.cgi

Reply via email to