Ole Bjørn Hessen wrote: > > I see a couple of ways out of this complexity problem: > > 1. Rewrite RRD-tool to separate the database from the graphing and wait > for someone to come up with a much smarter database method ;-) > Yup, this would be a huge step forward for RRDtool! It would make it more into a toolkit and make it easier for others to contribute as they could focus on a specific portion of the codebase/functionality. By separating the storage, we could experiment with storing individual RRAs in a SQL database or in a BDB. I can imagine that the buffer management and sequential log writes built into databases could significantly improve the performance, but then I can also imagine that they could screw it up in a major way :-).
Thorsten -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://lists.ee.ethz.ch/rrd-developers WebAdmin http://lists.ee.ethz.ch/lsg2.cgi
