On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 10:50:20PM +0200, Henrik Stoerner wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 10:44:49PM +0200, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
>> ARM figures should be collected, too, i guess.
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -a
>Linux rebel 2.6.18-4-footbridge #1 Sat Apr 21 14:54:00 UTC 2007 armv4l 
>GNU/Linux
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ arch
>armv4l
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ./tobi
>    0.000000e+00 ->  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>    1.000000e+00 ->  00 00 f0 3f 00 00 00 00
>   -1.000000e+00 ->  00 00 f0 bf 00 00 00 00
>             nan ->  ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
>             inf ->  00 00 f0 7f 00 00 00 00
>            -inf ->  00 00 f0 ff 00 00 00 00
>    2.000000e+00 ->  00 00 00 40 00 00 00 00
>    4.000000e+00 ->  00 00 10 40 00 00 00 00
>    8.000000e+00 ->  00 00 20 40 00 00 00 00
>    1.600000e+01 ->  00 00 30 40 00 00 00 00
>   8.642135e+130 ->  43 2b 1f 5b 2f 25 c0 c7

thanks!

are armel and armeb identical in this respect?

_______________________________________________
rrd-developers mailing list
rrd-developers@lists.oetiker.ch
https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-developers

Reply via email to