Hi Florian, Today Florian Forster wrote:
> Hi Tobi, > > > I have the impression that you feel rather unhappy about some of my > > design 'decisions' and opinions. > > I have to admit that, in fact, that was the trigger to propose the > split and I probably wouldn't have done that out of thin air. Not > because the proposition was made out of defiance, but because > maintaining a separate project is a lot of work and my time is already > limited as is.. And I feel very uncomfortable saying ?we should split it > up, but I'm not doing it?. ok > > Because I will continue to reserve final say about goes and what does > > not go in rrdtool, I suggested a fork, so that you could develop your > > branch of the cached in the way you see fit. > > That's not the problem: In my opinion a ?monarchy? is the only way a > free software project of this size can work reasonably well. What broke > my patience was not that you made decisions I wouldn't have made, but > that you didn't respond to my arguments. sorry ... I was not trying to intentionally ignore you ... > As I said before: A fork is out of question. > > > You could focus on the needs of collectd and develop the cache to be a > > perfect match. > > How does collectd come into play here? If I was only concerned about > collectd, I wouldn't have to write RRDCacheD at all ? collectd's RRDtool > plugin has had caching since version 4.0, released in June 2007.. we call it 'heimkino' ... :-) cheers tobi > Regards, > -octo > -- Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten, Switzerland http://it.oetiker.ch t...@oetiker.ch ++41 62 775 9902 / sb: -9900 _______________________________________________ rrd-developers mailing list rrd-developers@lists.oetiker.ch https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-developers