Hi Tobi and Fidelis,

On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 08:36:36AM +0200, Tobias Oetiker wrote:
> Tuesday Fidelis Assis wrote:
> > Sebastian Harl escreveu:
> > > I'm pretty sure, we'll find a solution ;-) In the worst case, I'd have
> > > to build-conflict with any other lua version to make sure /usr/bin/lua
> > > points to lua5.1 - that's quite ugly though and I'd have to touch the
> > > package any time a new version of lua has been uploaded, so I'd like to
> > > avoid that.
> >
> > Please, check if this will do. It'll force lua5.1, if available, even if
> > /usr/bin/lua points elsewhere.
> >
> > --- program-rev1919/configure.ac    2009-09-29 14:01:36.000000000 -0300
> > +++ program-rev1919-new/configure.ac        2009-09-29 14:58:35.000000000 
> > -0300
[…]
> what is the status on lua ... did you find a portable solution ?

Sorry, I did not have any time yet to have another look at that. For
now, we're build-conflicting with lua50 in the Debian package to work
around that. I might have some time to look at that issue tomorrow.

Cheers,
Sebastian

-- 
Sebastian "tokkee" Harl +++ GnuPG-ID: 0x8501C7FC +++ http://tokkee.org/

Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.         -- Benjamin Franklin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
rrd-developers mailing list
rrd-developers@lists.oetiker.ch
https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-developers

Reply via email to