On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 20:54 +0200, Tobias Oetiker wrote: > Hi Svante, > > Today Svante Signell wrote: > > > > > > > better choose a new function name and whoever is using it knows > > > that they have to free the data they get from the call. > > > > What about the new version, here get_path is defined differently > > depending on whether POSIX.1-2008 is supported or not by #if-ing on > > _POSIX_VERSION (see man realpath). However, I can use a different name > > for the alloced version compared to the constant version. > > I just realice that get_path is a static function, so there is no > problem 'fixing/changeing' it since it is not visible from the > outside. > > sorry for the confusion
Should the code be conditional or not, what do you prefer? BTW: get_abs_path in rrd_daemon.c is also static. _______________________________________________ rrd-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-developers
