Le 7 mai 2014 16:10, "Tobias Oetiker" <[email protected]> a écrit : > Today Svante Signell wrote:
> > Well, the PATH_MAX patches affect all architectures, but without them > > rrdtool FTBFS for Hurd. For other architectures, like Linux, the code > > should work the same. With the patches memory is allocated on the heap, > > without on the stack. There should be no memory leaks in either case. > > ok :-) that might be a bit tricky Would it be acceptable to revert to malloc() if and only if PATH_MAX is not defined ? That would nicely minimize the patch impact on already working platforms. -- Steve Schnepp
_______________________________________________ rrd-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-developers
