>Perhaps you can take both mails and compare. That's what I did on my last email.
> I don't see why my explanation conflicts with what Tobi writes. Your explanation states that a larger (yearly for example) RRA obtains its points from a smaller (daily) RRA. Tobi states that the points from every RRA would come from an RRD. >Please read the tutorial and the documentation, then explain where either Tobi or I go wrong. I read the documentation and completed the tutorial before I asked my question. I've explained both in the last email and above why I think your opinion differs from Tobi's. I asked you to clarify. On 2/13/02 5:05 PM, "Alex van den Bogaerdt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Clay Jones wrote: >> >> I do not possess the knowledge to know if I am right. I do not understand >> how this tool works. The person who wrote it's comments seem to conflict >> with yours. >> >> How do you explain it? > > I don't see why my explanation conflicts with what Tobi writes. > > I also do not see where I would go wrong. Perhaps you can take both > mails and compare. Please read the tutorial and the documentation, > then explain where either Tobi or I go wrong. Use the lingo that's > used in the documentation. > > Alex > Clay Jones wrote: > > > Hello, > > What you say below seems to conflict with what Tobias said in his response: > > quote: > > "the RRAs are independent, data for each RRA comes direct from > the data you enter ... each RRA has its own 'holdingarea' where > data is prepared to enter the RRA" > > I'm interpreting "the data you enter" to be the RRD. So, why do you assume that you're right and I'm wrong ? -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-users WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
