On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 10:59:27AM +0200, Fabien Wernli wrote: > On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 10:55:20AM +0200, Alex van den Bogaerdt wrote: > > stalled. Perhaps it's time to pick it up again. There does however > > not seem to be much demand for it, eventhough it seemed a good idea. > > I think it's a great idea. > I mean it's very valuable information to have the time when a critical value > has been reached.
There are limitations: If there are two equal peaks, is the first one more critical than the last? This choice is quite arbitrary. Or is the 99.999% peak less important than the 99.9991% peak? For a computer this is a significant difference. -- Alex van den Bogaerdt http://www.vandenbogaerdt.nl/rrdtool/ -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://lists.ee.ethz.ch/rrd-users WebAdmin http://lists.ee.ethz.ch/lsg2.cgi