Yes, i clearly need that the tool returns a value in this case. Thank you for your help.
2007/11/19, Simon Hobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Gwenael Lahay wrote: > > >Indeed, i put a wrong command in my previous mail. The frequency is > >not correct but the other parameters is good. > >Concerning my problem, does it mean that i should use a very hight > >value for xff (like 0.9 or 0.99) ? > > You need to consider your requirements. > > If it is important to get a value returned at 10:30 when you only put > in the one value, then yes, you will have to use a large xff value > (at least 0.97). > > However, that means you will still get a value returned at other > times when 29 of the 30 samples are missing - or 25 are missing, or > 10, or ... > > So you need to consider whether it's more important to have the value > - or to show that input data was missing. > > _______________________________________________ > rrd-users mailing list > rrd-users@lists.oetiker.ch > https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-users >
_______________________________________________ rrd-users mailing list rrd-users@lists.oetiker.ch https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-users
