Emily Chouinard wrote: >So what I've gathered from working with this, is once I removed the >stack and turned the line into an area it all seem to work out. >Therefore I assume, and please correct me if I'm wrong, but when you use >STACK the width of the line value is added so that in may case where it >should of displayed 99% instead it displayed a value above 100%
If you use STACK then whatever you are drawing is stacked on top of the last plot - ie the last plot is used as the baseline and your values are added. If you don't use stack, then the values are plotted from 0 as a baseline. >is >there a way to get around this so that I can still create the beautiful >graph I want but not have the STACK affect my final displayed values? I'm not 100% sure what you are trying to achieve - I think you are trying to draw an area for Nice, then a line 1% above it, then an area above that for Sys, another line 1% above that, and so on with User and Idle. Since you are drawing three lines, each value 1 stacked on top of Nice, Sys, and User, then the total will always be 103%. Why not draw a line at value 0 ? If that doesn't work, then you could draw the stacked areas, then go back and draw lines at Nice, Nice+Sys, and Nice+Sys+User. _______________________________________________ rrd-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-users
