> -----邮件原件----- > 发件人: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 Scott Brim > 发送时间: 2009年5月7日 19:43 > 收件人: Toni Stoev > 抄送: IRTF RRG > 主题: Re: [rrg] Inter/intra-domain routing separation > > Toni Stoev allegedly wrote on 05 05 2009 5:35 AM: > > Intra-domain routing can be considered as a general solution. This > > general solution is the provision of reachability throughout an > > autonomous system. Node locators can be considered intra-domain > > locators. Every locator shall have default association with its > > containing autonomous system in order to be universally > recognizable. > > First, see http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1955 > > Second, IMHO AS#s are the wrong granularity.
How about providing enough flexibility so that both AS granularity and prefix granularity are available? For example, those tunnel endpoint routers (ETR) within the same AS could either use unique unicast addresses per router or an anycast address as their tunnel endpoint addresses (RLOC). Xiaohu > - a prefix can be reachable via more than one AS > > - there can be more than one prefix within an AS > > - it should be possible to route different prefixes, and > subprefixes, > via different paths for traffic engineering purposes. > > Scott > _______________________________________________ > rrg mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
