On Jul 4, 2009, at 11:44 AM, Toni Stoev wrote:

Dear fellow (re)searchers,

Some of the opinions expressed on the list, with positions that I share, include the concept of protocol layering. There is an alternative to that concept. It is the role-based architecture (RBA). It gives much freedom with consistency. I would like to communicate here, knowing that at least some of you know what role-based architecture is.
Please, anyone interested, find the documentation of RBA and read it.
Or maybe you already know RBA.
Either case, please, let me know.

Hi Toni,

Thanks for the msg, RBA can indeed be an interesting topic.
On the other hand, my understanding of the goal of this RG at this time is to address routing scalability issue without requiring the whole Internet moving to an entirely different architecture.

Lixia
_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg

Reply via email to