On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[Verizon]<[email protected]> wrote: > Day's PNA is more than "vaguely interesting" as it (correctly) > factors networking functions into the common primitives that > recurse throughout all of the existing stacks in use, and > differences between layers as policy rather than protocol. It > further develops naming & resolution of processes within a > Distributed IPC Facility (DIF) / layer, and describes just what > you asked for in intimate detail.
Wes, At the risk of revealing myself to be a cheap bastard, who will refund my fifty bucks if it doesn't? Certainly nothing I found on pouzinsociety.org hinted at the answer to my question though I'd be happy to have you point out what I missed. Seriously: if you think the idea has merit, lets dive in to the nitty-gritty of how it might work. That is, after all, what this research group is for. Convince me there's more here than a half-formed abstraction and I -will- go buy the book. If not, I'll wait for the movie. Regards, Bill -- William D. Herrin ................ [email protected] [email protected] 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004 _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
