> > > On 7/30/09 8:21 AM, Tony Li wrote: > > All of the old ones have great difficulty in changing the > L3 point of > > attachment, and end up using the Home Agent concept as the > rendezvous > > point. If location is independent of identity, then it's > conceivable > > that one can update peer locations without loosing connections. > > What about HIP?
With HIP, how do two correspondents (which negotiate a HITs between them) refer to a 3rd which they don't communicate with at the moment? Ephemeral IDs are problematic in the real world, since global naming and referrals today tends to use unique and semi-permanent IDs. -Darrel _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
