Hi Fred, Thank you for your information. Hope to see the implementation related paper soon.
BTW, I like the idea of using GSE to realize NAT66 :) Xiaohu > -----邮件原件----- > 发件人: Fred Baker [mailto:[email protected]] > 发送时间: 2009年8月3日 18:58 > 收件人: Xu Xiaohu > 抄送: [email protected]; 'IRTF RRG' > 主题: Re: [rrg] Some concerns about ILNP > > FYI - I had some students at Beijing University of Post and Telegraph > (BUPT) do an implementation of GSE using several approaches > to this problem, one of which was ILNP. The key thing to the > study was an agreed-to-be-weird routing scenario that forced > a session to oscillate among the available address pairs on > every exchange; see section 1.4.1 of the attached for the > scenario. They tried kind of "all of the above" in terms of > endpoint identifier approaches, and they all failed with two > exceptions, GSE as described by Mike and ILNP. HIP couldn't > set up the association as it depends on the first few > messages getting across without the address changing until > the HIT is established, and this changed them there. > > I would support RJA's contentions here; ILNP gets the job > done, even in the presence of EID duplication in the network. > > The BUPT kids will be publishing a paper out of this, > assuming they can get interest from an appropriate journal. > > _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
