> -----邮件原件----- > 发件人: rrg-boun...@irtf.org [mailto:rrg-boun...@irtf.org] 代表 Darrel > Lewis (darlewis) > 发送时间: 2009年12月3日 1:50 > 收件人: Noel Chiappa; rrg@irtf.org > 主题: Re: [rrg] moving towards recommendation: the current plan > > > > However, I still think that engineering considerations favour > > network-based > > for the initial deployment - and have since the 1980s; an > > advanced routing > > system which I worked on back then used the same approach, > > and for exactly > > the same reasons. The vast increase in the size of the host > > installed base > > since then has only reinforced the case for starting with > > network-based > > deployment. > > > > Noel, > > I'd note that (most?) of the host based schemes for loc-id split seem to > add network middle boxes to aid in their initial deployment (hip-proxy, > shim6-proxy, et al). So it seems reasonable to me to accept this and > start by optimizing for this case and move to the hosts over time.
Absolutely agree. Both network-based schemes and host-based schemes should be considered since each will be suitable in different time frames. draft-zhang-zhang-evolution-02.txt has outlined a route map for evolution. Maybe host-based schemes can be considered by the authors to be appended as step six or seven. Xiaohu _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list rrg@irtf.org http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
