On Jan 16, 2010, at 12:29 AM, Robin Whittle wrote:
Hi Tony and Javier,
Thanks for your replies.
My understanding is that one or more people can write a critique and
post it to the list. Then other people can suggest improvements,
which the original author(s) may or may not incorporate to the
satisfaction of the second person.
Second and subsequent individuals or groups can contribute
alternative critiques by posting them to the list - and Lixia and
Tony will choose one of them.
I think this would be a good approach. In that case, I think that
whenever anyone posts a critique to the list, that it should not be
immediately "incorporated".
- Robin
Robin,
it seems to me that Tony's suggestion is the best, i.e. people who
want to contribute to the critique of the same proposal collaborate to
finalize the critique, with the resulting critique that incorporate
all main points.
if we had to choose one among multiples, it is likely to miss some
issues raised in the dropped writing.
It is possible that people working on the same critique may not reach
100% agreement on all the issues, in that case the critique can just
document such disagreements.
Lixia
_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
rrg@irtf.org
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
