K.C., On 2/14/10 6:19 PM, k claffy wrote: > sorry, someone pointed out a typo in (2) below; > i meant to suggest > > (2) i understand such a chart is likely blocked on more meat > filled in on critiques/rebuttal/counterpoints for each > proposal. has the wg considered asking all proposal submitters > to submit critiques of at least three (or some N) other > proposals, including estimating the corresponding lines of > a feature comparison matrix? > > this suggestion is based on the imbalance in the > current draft between ideas-submitted and > ideas-rigorously-evaluated. i suspect the IETF > needs more of the latter, which it doesn't look > like natural WG forces are going to produce. >
I think this is a great (and necessary) idea to give authority to the work people are doing. Eliot _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list rrg@irtf.org http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
