Below. Regards, DY
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Tony Li <tony...@tony.li> wrote: >> No, IMHO, the ILNP hosts should provide the same connectivity service to >> the legacy hosts as today. That's to say, once the ILNP host moves from one >> attachment point to anther due to re-homing (or mobility), the already >> established sessions should still survive. > > Disagree. That's service above and beyond what a legacy host would provide. I'd believe that such a session will persist/survive in ILNP. Since ID is used in a TCP connection in ILNP, even if the Locator changes by moving, the TCP connection (or session, if people would continue to call it that way confusingly) would survive/persist. _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list rrg@irtf.org http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
