On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Noel Chiappa wrote:
Also true. The usual way to deal with that is 'try several', to
reduce risk that the 'chosen alternative' turns out to not be
workable. That's not formally possible here, but I suspect that
informally that's what's going to happen.
I'm not sure it's enough just to try several. That will catch
'workability' problems, as you suggest, but it won't per se tell us
which solutions handle growth the best, will it?
If we wish to avoid the learning-through-internet-scale-rollout path,
it'd be really useful to model some of the different options against
each other. If that hasn't been done already? (I'm presuming not).
Might there be some pretty rich seams here to mine for academic work?
regard,
--
Paul Jakma p...@jakma.org Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Fortune:
The ultimate game show will be the one where somebody gets killed at the end.
-- Chuck Barris, creator of "The Gong Show"
_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
rrg@irtf.org
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
