> Was the initial/primary goal in regard to mobility? I don't think so.
> It was to multi-homing.
>
> With multi-homing situation, I don't think we're so much sensitively
> concerned with breakage of TCP connections.
Disagree strongly. People multi-home for service reliability, both inbound
and outbound. They use PI because when there is a failure, routing will
reconverge and sessions will continue.
> Would you please compare the performance quality of the current
> Internet (assuming use of only PA addresses, not PI) against ILNP in
> terms of routing scalability?
? That's assuming the solution. The whole point is to wean the Internet
from PI.
> And please be kind to elaborate more why ILNP would outperform the
> current Internet
>
> - with ILNP hosts seamlessly transitioning/failover across multiple
> Locators
> - against old hosts transitioning across multiple PA addresses.
Old hosts don't transition.
Tony
_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
rrg@irtf.org
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
