Tom,
> o There must be a paragraph near the beginning (for example, in the > introduction) describing the level of support for publication. > Example text might read: "this document represents the consensus > of the FOOBAR RG" or "the views in this document were considered > controversial by the FOOBAR RG but the RG reached a consensus that > the document should still be published". ' > > I think it clear that the ILNP specs do not represent the consensus of > the FOOBAR or any other RG; are they considered controversial, or > something in-between? Definitely controversial. ;-) Note that I expect all of our documents will fall in this bucket. Tony _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
