I like to respond by using the RRG-mailinglist rather than the RAM-mailinglist while assuming that the RRG-mailiglist is for "free routing research" where backward - compatability is not the first priority. However free routing research may turn out to yield results which enable IPv4 to continue, in principle, forever (which does not mean that IPv4 can't use improvements). Remember, Rekther's law talks about two alternatives. So far attention is only given to one of them. Heiner In einer eMail vom 30.10.2007 19:26:03 Westeuropäische Normalzeit schreibt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
RJ Atkinson posted the first 3 links to the now-dormant RAM list. I have added another link to a potentially interesting discussion on PPML. - Robin These 3 presentations (PDF) made at the RIPE 55 meeting last week in Amsterdam, NL might be of interest to a few folks lurking here. "IPv6 Allocation & Announcements" by Randy Bush (IIJ): http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-55/presentations/bush-ipv6-allocation.p df IPv6 Transition & Operational Reality by Randy Bush (IIJ): http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-55/presentations/bush-ipv6-transition.p df "IPv4 Depletion & the Afterworld" [Also called the "train wreck" talk in the RIPE hallways.] by Geoff Huston (APNIC): http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-55/presentations/huston-ipv4.pdf "Effects of explosive routing table growth on ISP behavior" http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/ppml/2007-October/009714.html http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/ppml/2007-October/009716.html http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/ppml/2007-October/009717.html -- to unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
