Yes, of course. Thanks for the clarification. Jari
Fleischman, Eric kirjoitti: > I believe that MEXT is inherently off topic for this list because MEXT > relies upon NEMO and NEMO does not cause mobility impacts upon the > Internet scaling that I am aware of -- possibly unlike the other > mobility alternatives. > > However, the MEXT work presumes using NEMO and solely limits > considerations of civil aviation requirements to NEMO solutions. It is > accurate to say that there are individuals within the civil aviation > community who are interested in NEMO and MEXT as possible solutions for > aircraft mobility, but any assertion that MEXT represents a civil > aviation consensus would be very inaccurate at this current time. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jari Arkko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> FWIW, we have an existing WG in the IETF to >> look at the aviation mobility case, MEXT. They >> are in stage 1, understanding what the requirements are. >> > > > > -- to unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
