31 Day BGP Profile: 30-July-2008 00:00 - 29-August-2008 23:59 (UTC+1000) Number of BGP Update Messages: 4387614 Number of Prefix Updates: 5642288 Number of Prefix Withdrawals: 503877 Average Prefixes per BGP Update: 1.40 Average BGP Update Messages per second: 1.59 Average Prefix Updates per second: 2.22 Peak BGP Update Message Rate per second: 6308 (14:02:43 Fri, 22-Aug-2008) Peak Prefix Update Rate per second: 3207 (18:36:01 Tue, 5-Aug-2008) Peak Prefix Withdraw Rate per second: 15121 (14:03:18 Fri, 22-Aug-2008
How would these figures look like in case of a renumbering action ?! Heiner -------- Kabel E-Mail Reply --------------- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 30.08.2008 02:10:54 Tony Li wrote: > One of the topics that came up in Dublin during Lixia's talk was the > acceptability of renumbering. How do folks feel about an architectural > solution requiring renumbering to retain scalability? > We _already_ have a scalable solution that requires end-sites to renumber: RFC 4192. The target market rolled their eyes and got the RIRs to change policy to allow PI assignments in IPv6, just like in IPv4, rather than even give it a try because the very concept was so unacceptable. Can we please quit beating this horse? S -- to unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
