On 27 Jun 2007, at 16:57, David Chelimsky wrote: > There's an RFE for this in the tracker - wanna contribute this as a > patch? If you do, please use "facet" instead of "aspect".
I had a quick look at this - didn't get much chance because I had work to do too. I had a scan through the specs and code for the Behaviour class, but I came a bit unstuck because adding the "facet" method doesn't actually add any behaviour. So what goes in the specs? Is it enough to test that a spec inside a facet (inside a facet?) runs? Or a spec inside a facet (inside a facet?) fails? Or should I test that specs get added to the list of those due to run? Ashley _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
