El 22/6/2007, a las 15:34, Wincent Colaiuta escribió: > El 22/6/2007, a las 14:36, Tom Locke escribió: > >> Easier to read: >> >> expected: >> "this is a very long string blah blah" >> got: >> "this is a very very long string blah blah" >> (using ==) >> >> Comments? > > For me even easier to read would be: > > expected: "this is a very long string blah blah" > got : "this is a very very long string blah blah" > (using ==)
I've whipped up a patch for this against the current trunk (r2153). I was sick of seeing output like this: <http://pastie.textmate.org/76179> Now I see output like this: <http://pastie.textmate.org/76180> So for really short strings ("foo" vs "bar") readability is about the same, and for longer strings like the ones in the linked examples the readability is much improved. For *really* long strings (which wrap over multiple lines) readability in the console still sucks. You can see this for yourself by resizing your browser window to see how readability goes down as soon as wrapping starts to take place. But this is still a big improvement. If you run your specs from inside TextMate then even long strings are much more readable, because SpecMate doesn't perform soft wrapping of long lines when showing diffs. Pasting the diff here: <http://pastie.textmate.org/76181> Will also try submitting via RubyForge, but I have a lot of troubling logging in thanks to the transparent proxy imposed by my ISP... :-( Cheers, Wincent _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
