On Aug 10, 2007, at 10:01 AM, David Chelimsky wrote: > On 8/10/07, Lance Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Thusfar, my experience with stubbing and mocking has not been a walk >> in the park either. Hopefully this will change when rspec's mocking >> and stubbing matures some more. > > Please elaborate. What new features are you expecting rspec's mocking > framework to adopt?
I would really like to see better support for anonymous functions + and what they execute. I've posted several emails now about spec'ing anonymous functions and have gotten no replies. I think the fixture problem has been the mutability of data while doing TDD/BDD. When you change a field name, do you end up changing 6 fixture records field names? What about if you change the data that a model should have? This is the real advantage to generating the fixture data in ruby - it allows more rapid BDD. Scott _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
