On 10/14/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/14/07, Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think we all know that the readability of steps isn't great right
> > now, and in fact there's a very recent thread that discusses just
> > that.  It was that recent thread that prompted me to explore this a
> > bit.
> >
> > The basic idea is that you define step matchers, which have a regex,
> > and then you match step names against that regex.  Kind of tough for
> > me to explain so I'll just link to some code :)
> >
> > spec: http://pastie.caboo.se/107116
> > impl: http://pastie.caboo.se/107117
> >
> > Instead of writing
> > Given "a user named __ who is __ years old", "Pat Maddox", 22
> >
> > it allows you to write
> > Given "a user named Pat Maddox who is 22 years old"
> >
> > I wrote it out as a separate matcher because it was just easiest to do
> > it that way while I explored this approach, no messing around with
> > RSpec internals to get it to really work.  However if we went this
> > route the structure would certainly be different.
> >
> > Hopefully you can get the idea from the example code.  Ideally what I
> > would like is to write step libraries that are external to the stories
> > themselves.  The stories would be much clearer because the
> > implementation would not be embedded, and the step names themselves
> > would make a lot more sense.
> >
> > wdyt?
>
> LOL - I just suggested something like this in the other thread you
> cite. Though your idea strikes me as far more flexible and usable.
> Well done!!!!

This just occurs to me. If we do away with the need for special
characters/positioning, blocks, etc, we should be able to do just
this, no?

Given a savings account with 100 dollars
When the account owner asks for 101 dollars
Then the account owner should receive 0 dollars
Then the account should have 100 dollars

Look mom - no quotes!

Cheers,
David

>
> Cheers,
> David
>
> >
> > Pat
> > _______________________________________________
> > rspec-users mailing list
> > rspec-users@rubyforge.org
> > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
> >
>
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

Reply via email to