On 10/15/07, Wincent Colaiuta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If the conventions are kept reasonably tight then this concern could > be largely ameliorated with a good automated tool for generating an > ".rb" file from an ".story" file, or updating an existing ".rb" file > from an updated ".story" file. > > So, for example, if the story file contained (excerpt only): > > Scenario: "foo bar baz" > > The tool would generate a file with: > > Scenario "foo bar baz" do > end
Personally, I'd prefer to avoid this sort of mapping. It seems to me that the simplest thing would be to have plain text stories/scenarios with libraries of step matchers. _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
