El 18/11/2007, a las 0:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: > Probably not. There was a longer discussion of it here: > http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=13837&group_id=797&atid=3152 > > As you point out, creating an alias is a one-liner. > The main reason I don't want to add it is that lambda is a common > idiom, and I don't want to set precedence of aliasing core Ruby idioms > just because some people don't like the ones in Ruby.
<devil's advocate> But it could be argued that RSpec is a Domain Specific Language of its own, and it's not Ruby; it just happens to be implemented in Ruby. </devil's advocate> Having said that, I'm fine with using "lambda" and even if I wasn't adding an alias to my spec_helper.rb would be no problem if I felt strongly about it. Cheers, Wincent _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
