Hi there, Would it make sense to put up a page on an RSpec wiki where a table of good combinations (versions of rails and rspec) would be maintained? Anyway, I think a wiki would be a good idea.
Stefan 2007/12/13, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Dec 12, 2007 10:17 PM, Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Dec 12, 2007 4:01 AM, aslak hellesoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > On Dec 12, 2007 12:48 AM, Yitzhak Bar Geva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > Is it OK to go ahead and generate a Rails 2.0 project with RSpec > 1.0.8? Am I > > > > likely to run into problems? > > > > > > When we released RSpec 1.0.8 there was no Rails 2.0. We always have to > > > do a fair amount of tweaks to keep up with Rails, so the versions > > > you're talking about are incompatible. > > > > > > As a general rule: Each RSpec release will work with the latest Rails > > > at the time of release. If you want to use a newer Rails, use RSpec > > > trunk. > > > > Do you think it would make sense to do an interim release of RSpec > > whenever a new Rails version gets released? > > We try to do releases right after rails releases - that's why we're > working hard to get 1.1 out the door now. > > > It (probably) shouldn't > > be based off of trunk, but rather the last stable release, with > > whatever little bug fixes may be required to work with Rails. That > > way there's no question...for any Rails version, people have the > > choice of using a stable version of RSpec trunk. > > > > Pat > > > > _______________________________________________ > > rspec-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > -- Bekk Open Source http://boss.bekk.no
_______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
