On Dec 19, 2007 11:40 PM, James Deville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Dec 19, 2007, at 9:38 PM, David Chelimsky wrote: > > > On Dec 19, 2007 11:34 PM, James Deville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > >> Yeah, had a slight email conversation with David C about that in > >> regards to bug #188. I am wondering why we don't standardize it, ya > >> know convention over configuration and all. > > > > Because I think it's premature to call anything related to story > > runner a convention. I actually organize them differently from what > > many are calling convention, and my way is not necessarily "right" or > > "better." Let's wait a while on this. We'll get there. > > _______________________________________________ > > rspec-users mailing list > > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > > > Good enough for me. I just wanted a reason. May I ask how you set them > up?
Sure. stories/ stories/helper.rb stories/steps/ (steps go in here - that seems to be the "convention") stories/stuff_related_to_one_feature stories/stuff_related_to_another_feature stories/stuff_related_to_yet_another_feature So in this case, the only thing that would be consistent across projects would be helper.rb and the steps directory. Even that should probably be called step_definitions or something. I'm not sure. Anyhow - that's where I'm at. How about you? _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
