Along these lines, I also think that a empty spec should be failing or at least pending.
On Jan 27, 2008, at 6:50 AM, Matt Darby wrote: > Ah, I was unaware of this. Thanks for the pointer. > > On Jan 27, 2008, at 2:42 AM, Francois Wurmus wrote: > >> Hi Matt, >> >> one way of doing this is to leave the block out and just write: >> it "should bla bla" >> >> No 'do', no 'end'. The example will be pending this way. >> >> >> François > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users James Deville http://devillecompanies.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] rspec r3172 rspec_on_rails r3172 rails r8331 _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
