On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 10:26 PM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 9:07 PM, Zach Dennis > > As you mentioned David, > "Plain text is great for some situations, but > > so is writing in Ruby". This begs the question now that we have plain > > text stories. Can we make the ruby-based stories more developer > > friendly? Perhaps remove string identifiers, use symbols. Quit passing > > in blocks to story parts, assume each story part is a method call, and > > I'm sure there are other things that could be suggested as well. > > You can do all of this already except using symbols instead of > Strings, something which doesn't strike me as more readable. Here's an > example: > > http://pastie.caboo.se/155775
And here's another example with a bit more reuse expressed in the steps at the expense of more complexity in the steps. Which approach is better? I can't really say one is always better than the other. I choose based on readability in a given context. Just exploring possibilities. Cheers, David _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
