On 20 Mar 2008, at 14:31, Max Williams wrote:
> Sorry to be pedantic, but shouldn't that be
> "Your needs may differ from mine"? There's no party called 'mine', so
> 'mine' has no needs :)
A quick google for "those of mine" brings back a google book hit for
Shakespeare so maybe Edvard was being poetic :D
> Anyway, does anyone have any idea why
> -e "the name of a describe block"
>
> results in 0 tests being run for me?
Are you sure you are running the outer-most group, and not an inner
group or example? I just tried this file as test.spec.rb:
describe "add_descendants_from_xml" do
it "should add descendants" do
true.should be_false
end
describe "with attributes" do
it "should add attributes too" do
false.should be_true
end
end
end
* the outer group name works
~/Desktop % spec -e "add_descendants_from_xml" test.spec.rb
F
1)
'add_descendants_from_xml should add descendants' FAILED
expected false, got true
./test.spec.rb:3:
Finished in 0.007168 seconds
* testing the name of the inner group fails
~/Desktop % spec -e "with attributes" test.spec.rb
Finished in 0.001734 seconds
0 examples, 0 failures
* but, as expected
~/Desktop % spec -e "add_descendants_from_xml with attributes"
test.spec.rb
F
1)
'add_descendants_from_xml with attributes should add attributes too'
FAILED
expected true, got false
./test.spec.rb:8:
Finished in 0.007056 seconds
Failing that, are you sure you haven't got a typo? I can't see a
problem with the -e option.
Ashley
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
