Hmm. How come? As far as I've understood so far, then reports are generated it-method-by-it-method. So, why couldn't RSpec handle after :each methods similar to it-methods? So it would go something like this: -invoke it method -it method fails -invoke reporter's methods to generate report for failing it-method -invoke after :each method -something fails in after :each block -invoke reporter's methods to generate report for failing after :each method -invoke next-it and so on
I don't see any problems (maybe i'm just too narrow-minded, hehe) with that solution. Please be more specific if you still think that there is problem. David Chelimsky-2 wrote: > > I don't think so. If we did that and something was failing in the > 'after' blocks, you'd not see that reported. Make sense? > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/after-%3Aeach-invoked-before-formatter--tp17796760p17803189.html Sent from the rspec-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
