On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 5:17 AM, Piotr Wlodarek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > For the base class, it seems reasonable to specify public API with > > RSpec. > > > > However, since we deal with a base class, methods are often empty (put > > there just to show the API). > > What's the point of that? This isn't Java. > > Readability I would assume. Rspec does this in the base_formatter.rb and Rails does this in some places as well I have noticed. -- Zach Dennis http://www.continuousthinking.com
_______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
