Pat Maddox wrote: > On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 10:10 AM, Piotr Wlodarek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >>>> >>> goal. >> In a perfect world I would expect to have only one documentation tool: >> specs. > > I think in this case you could provide contract tests. These would be > shared behaviors that developers can mix in to their own specs. > Consider something basic for an account:
Thanks for the example. It carifies the issue. I will try it. ++++ BTW, do you think it's worthwile to replace most of rdoc and other documentation with specs? RSpec itself comes with nice RDoc, so perhaps I want too much? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
