On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 9:09 AM, Luis Lavena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Do you guys think that will be best to put the resource_class stub > inside the actions and create another context to deal with those > internals?
I would. In fact, if it were really necessary to treat a generic resource as a model, I'd consider wrapping it inside a model class and spec'ing it out as a model. -- Have Fun, Steve Eley Deep Salt Team _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
