Lol.  I need another coffee.  The should's needed to be above the post.
:-)

Tim.

On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Tim Haines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi there,
>
> I'm striking a wee problem - and haven't been able to figure it out.  In my
> before statement I'm setting up a mock video.  I'd like one of my examples
> to check that original= and save! are being called on the mock video, so I
> have an example that looks like this:
>
>       it "should update the original video and save the video" do
>         post :upload_video, :video_id => 'hi', :Filedata => @video_file
>         @vid.should_receive(:original=)
>         @vid.should_receive(:save!)
>       end
>
> This fails saying that @vid didn't receive original=.  However, if I move
> the two should's up into the before block, then the example passes.  I
> thought @vid might be getting reassigned somewhere before the example code
> is run, but I can't spot it.  (@video is used in the action - not @vid).
> Can anyone spot something obvious I'm doing wrong here?  I'm happy for any
> other feedback on this too - it's pretty ugly.  Here's the whole before
> block with the should's included in a location that let the example(s) pass:
>
>       before(:each) do
>         @video_file =  ActionController::TestUploadedFile.new(RAILS_ROOT +
> "/spec/fixtures/files/video.mpg",  'video/mp4')
>
>         @thumb = "thumb"
>         @thumb.stub!(:url).and_return("the_thumb_url")
>
>         @original = "original"
>         @original.stub!(:path)
>
>         @vid = mock_video(:original_thumbnail => @thumb, :convert_path =>
> "convert_path", :still_path => "still_path", :original => @original)
>         # @vid.stub!(:original=)
>         # @vid.stub!(:save!)
>
>
>         @videos = []
>         @videos.stub!(:find).and_return(@vid)
>         @current_user = mock_model(User, :id => 1, :videos => @videos)
>         controller.stub!(:current_user).and_return(@current_user)
>
>         @vid.should_receive(:original=)
>         @vid.should_receive(:save!)
>       end
>
>
> I'm betting it's something really obvious somewhere.  ;-)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Tim.
>
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

Reply via email to