On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Nick Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2008-09-29, at 07:58, David Chelimsky wrote: >> >> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 10:59 PM, Nick Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> >>> On 2008-09-28, at 17:20, Nick Hoffman wrote: >>>> >>>> 431 it 'should hide the map filter errors <div>' do >>>> 432 do_xhr @xhr_params >>>> 433 response.should have_rjs >>>> 434 # response.should have_rjs(:hide, 'map-filter-errors') >>>> 435 end >>> >>> I just discovered that I need to pass :chained_replace_html to #have_rjs >>> , >>> like so: >>> response.should have_rjs(:chained_replace_html, :hide, >>> 'map-filter-errors') >>> >>> However, after googling around and looking through the source for >>> #assert_select_rjs , I have no idea what :chained_replace_html does, nor >>> why >>> :hide is insufficient. Would someone mind enlightening me? >> >> I'm not sure why that is offhand, still waking up this fine Monday >> morning, but I'd recommend throwing this question to the rails mailing >> list if nobody responds here. >> >> Cheers, >> David > > Hi David. I've taken your advice and posted to the ror-talk list: > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk/browse_thread/thread/f7fc3f63660a7f33 > > I'm not sure what you meant by "why that is offhand"...
That's a common US expression meaning "without looking into it" or "off the top of my head". :) > > Cheers, > Nick > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
