On Sep 29, 2008, at 5:02 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Scott Taylor
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sep 29, 2008, at 4:36 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Scott Taylor
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sep 29, 2008, at 3:54 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Scott Taylor
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm trying to write a spec asserting that no layout should be
used in a
controller. My spec currently looks like this:
it "should render with no layout" do
controller.expect_render.with(hash_including(:layout => nil))
pre 1.1.5 this should be:
controller.expect_render(hash_including(:layout => nil))
(no with)
1.1.5 deprecates expect_render, having fixed the problem w/
should_receive:
controller.should_receive(:render).with(hash_including(:layout
=> nil))
That doesn't seem to be working for me. Will that work with only
an
explicit call to render :layout => nil the action? Do I need to
integrate
views?
Didn't realize that layout nil was a declaration at the top.
I haven't tried this, but you probably do need to integrate views
because it's never getting past the initial render call. That's
just a
guess.
That didn't work either. I had to go diving into rails ugliness,
per usual:
That's rails beauty. It's just testing rails in isolation ugliness :)
Yeah, but it's clear that this wasn't test first. If it was, you'd
have the following:
controller.layout.should be_nil
class AController
set_layout nil
end
Scott
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
