here's some examples:

'Recurring.add_projections: weekly & non-reconcile & starting in past should
update balances appropriately' FAILED
expected 1001, got #<BigDecimal:22a68d4,'0.1E4',4(12)> (using .eql?)
./spec/models/recurring_spec.rb:140:
==> Oh, actually seems to work but gives the figure in Engineering notation
- I wonder if there's a way to improve the readability here?

'Recurring.add projections (perform credit card payment) should calculate
amount based on offset provided' FAILED
expected no Exception, got #<RuntimeError: It should display this exception>
==> Actually does show exception name, but doesn't give a back trace?  Is
there a way to see the back trace if required?

tks



On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> What are you currently seeing?  afaik, you should currently see all the
> dots and a few F's when specs fail, and then after that you'll see
> detailed failure messages including backtraces.
>
> Pat
>
>
> "Greg Hauptmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Can I get more details in the "rake spec" output (e.g. for eql fail, what
> was the actual value that was returned)??? Another example might be what the
> exception
> > actually is in a case the "should not raise exception" fails...
> >
> > Regards
> > Greg
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rspec-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

Reply via email to