On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 12:07 AM, Pau Cor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> aslak hellesoy wrote:
>> give buttons unique dom ids and pass the id to #clicks_button ?
>
> Of course that's the easy way to do it :)
>
> I was hoping to keep my stories a bit closer to English. Plus then I'd
> need some extra instance variable so that step can calculate the dom_id.
> Here is an example of what I'm going for:
>
> Scenario: Accepting a friend request
> Given there is a user named "Fred"
> And I am logged in as a normal user named "Joe"
> And there is an unaccepted invite from "Fred" to me
> And there is a user named "Sally"
> And there is an unaccepted invite from "Sally" to me
> When I go to "the invites from friends page"
> And I push "accept" near "Fred"
> # I want to avoid: And I push #accept_button_user_1
You're on the right track, and I don't think Aslak was recommending
putting accept_button_user_1 in the step.
What you can do is put it in the step definition, and use some sort of map.
For example, I usually have a map of page names to paths so I can say:
When I visit the new pet form
which is implemented like this:
When /I visit the (.*)/ do |page|
visit case page
when "new pet form"
new_pet_path
end
end
So you can do a similar mapping with Fred. Maybe it works like this
(just guessing - don't know what your app looks like)
When /I push "(.)" near "(.*)" do |what, who|
user = User.find_by_first_name(who)
clicks_button "#{what}_button_user_#{user.id}"
end
As long as you keep this sort of thing simple, I find it very
manageable and it actually begins to encourage good APIs and
conventions in the app.
> Then I should see "Now you are friends with Fred"
> When I push "ignore" near "Sally"
> Then I should see "Sally won't ever bother you again"
>
>
> Or maybe you are suggesting:
>
> Scenario: Accepting a friend request
> Given there is a user named "Fred"
> And I am logged in as a normal user named "Joe"
> And there is an unaccepted invite from "Fred" to me
> And there is a user named "Sally"
> And there is an unaccepted invite from "Sally" to me
I might do something to eliminate the need for the previous statement:
Given /there is an unaccepted invite from "(.*)" to me/ do |username|
user = User.find_or_create_by_first_name(username)
# whatever you need to create the invite
end
Now these first lines can be reduced to:
Given I am logged in as a normal user named "Joe"
And there is an unaccepted invite from "Fred" to me
And there is an unaccepted invite from "Sally" to me
That's a lot less noise, and there is a clear implication that Fred
and Sally exist.
WDYT?
David
> When I go to "the invites from friends page"
> And I push "accept" for user "Fred"
> Then I should see "Now you are friends with Fred"
> When I push "ignore" for user "Sally"
> Then I should see "Sally won't ever bother you again"
>
> with this matcher:
> When /^I push "(.*)" for user "(.*)"$/ do |button, user_name|
> user = User.find_by_name(user_name)
> scope.clicks_button("accept_#{dom_id(user)}")
> end
>
> Am I putting too much thought into this?
>
> Paul
>
> P.S. I am sorry if this has been a dumb question. I'm still just trying
> to learn the best way to approach this stuff.
> --
> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
