On 23 Ún, 17:30, Stephen Eley <sfe...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 5:45 PM, vo.x <v.ondr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello everybody! > > > Im wondering what is the best way of specing action with send file > > such as: > > I'd probably do it on two fronts. On the unit test level, you can > stub it in your setup so that it won't try to send that file every > time you run tests, then mock it in one particular spec with > "[yourcontroller].should_receive(:send_file).with([your params])" to > make sure it's getting called with the right values. > > In your integration tests (with RSpec or Cucumber or Selenium or > trained gerbils or whatever), have it actually send the file. Then, > if you're using RSpec or Cucumber with Webrat, you can check the > response object to make sure it has the right length, the right > content-type, and if you want to be thorough, do a checksum on the > body to make sure the right stuff was sent. > > If you're using Selenium, life's even better: you can look to make > sure that the file showed up in your Downloads directory (set your > browser to not prompt you on that file type first) and checksum the > actual file as it was actually saved. > > Does that make sense? > > -- > Have Fun, > Steve Eley (sfe...@gmail.com) > ESCAPE POD - The Science Fiction Podcast Magazine > http://www.escapepod.org > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-us...@rubyforge.orghttp://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
Aha, it seems that there is difference between behavior of Rails 2.1 and 2.3. In Rails 2.1 stubbing works like a charm but it fails with Rails 2.3 :/ Vit _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
