On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Lenny Marks <[email protected]> wrote: > These scenarios are each distinct things so to me are 'features' in a way > but they may also be trivial to implement, so using any kind of 'a feature > should generally take n days/weeks to implement' guideline would make that > smell.
I don't think there is a correspondence between a feature and its implementation time. A feature defines a unit of user value. A very useful feature could be trivial to implement. A minor feature could take weeks. This is why developers should cost features, not business. ///ark _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
