James Byrne wrote: > Aslak Hellesøy wrote: >> >> We switched to using response.should contain(text) a while back. This is >> just a wrapper around Rails' assert_contain, the preferred (I think) way >> to check for text on a page.
I am thinking that you are right. This particular feature was written back when I was first starting out with cucumber, features and steps and BDD. I have since taken to checking for specific css ids relating to messages and notices in steps rather than looking for the text itself. I likely will refactor this step to do the same. I think, if it is not already on the wiki, that cucumber users might be encouraged to put any local additions to support/env.rb into a separate file like support/local_env.rb. Running script/generate cucumber to upgrade an existing project leaves those with customized env.rb files with two equally unappealing alternatives; keep the old and forgo the new or replace it entirely. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
