On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 3:09 AM, svoop <sv...@delirium.ch> wrote: > Pat Maddox <pat.mad...@...> writes: >> Okay I must be dense because I'm not sure what you mean by it gets in >> the way of refactoring. > > Actually, scratch that, because... > >> And you're right about how it behaves...that's exactly how default >> attrs work. If you want to test that your model doesn't allow invalid >> data, you have to explicitly give it invalid data. > > Using .with instead of .except does the trick just fine and does just that, > set > the model explicitly to invalid data.
gah, I totally get it now! Wasn't noticing that in one case you were passing in a full attributes hash (valid_attributes) and in the second you were only setting one value. Makes sense to me now. Glad you figured it out :) Pat _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
